TheGridNet
The Madrid Grid Madrid

ESMO 2023: EV-103 Cohort L: Perioperative Treatment with Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

ESMO 2023, EV-103 Cohort L, Enfortumab Vedotin (EV), Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy, Perioperative Treatment With Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), cT2-4aN0M0, cT1-4aN1M0. The 2023 European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Congress in Madrid, Spain was held between October 20th and 24th. Dr. Srikala Sridhar presented the results of EV-103 Cohort L, which evaluated the perioperative treatment with Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). The current guideline-recommended standard of care for patients with MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin (CMIBC)-based chemotherapy followed by surgery, with adjuvant therapy recommended in high-risk patients. However, up to 50% of patients may be cis Platin-ineligible and are recommended to proceed with surgery alone. There were no new safety signals, no delays to surgery, and a low incidence of grade 3 or worse EV-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The safety profile of the treatment was similar to that of previously used by Enfortuvant patients.

ESMO 2023: EV-103 Cohort L: Perioperative Treatment with Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Yayınlanan : 2 yıl önce ile içinde Auto

(UroToday.com) The 2023 European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Congress held in Madrid, Spain between October 20th and 24th, 2023 was host to a non-prostate, genitourinary tumors mini oral session. Dr. Srikala Sridhar presented the results of EV-103 Cohort L, which evaluated the perioperative treatment with enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Up to 25% of all patients diagnosed with urothelial cancers present with MIBC. The current guideline-recommended standard of care for patients with MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery, with adjuvant therapy recommended in high-risk patients.1 However, up to 50% of patients may be cisplatin-ineligible and are recommended to proceed with surgery alone. Due to the high rates of recurrence in cisplatin-ineligible patients treated with surgery alone, there remains a significant clinical unmet need for novel therapies in this setting. Previously, neoadjuvant EV in cisplatin-ineligible MIBC showed encouraging anti-tumor activity, with a pathologic complete response (pCR) proportion of 36% and pathologic downstaging of 50%.2 Importantly, there were no new safety signals, no delays to surgery, and a low incidence of grade 3 or worse EV-related treatment-emergent adverse events. EV-103 Cohort L (NCT03288545) examines a perioperative approach consisting of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant EV in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC.

EV-103 Cohort L included patients with cisplatin-ineligible cT2-4aN0M0 or cT1-4aN1M0 urothelial carcinoma patients medically fit for a radical cystectomy + pelvic nodal dissection. Following enrollment, patients were given EV monotherapy (1.25 mg/kg) in 3-week cycles on days 1 and 8 for 3 cycles total. Following surgery, patients received the same regimen for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was pCR, with secondary objectives of pathologic downstaging (pDS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability.

Cohort L included 51 patients. The median age was 74 years. 96% had ECOG performance status 0 – 1. The baseline stage was cT2N0 for 57% and cN+ for 10% of patients. 45% of patients had a creatinine clearance of 30 – 60 mL/min.

82.4% of patients completed all 3 cycles of neoadjuvant EV, with all these patients completing surgery within a median time of 1.3 months from the last EV dose.

For pathologic outcomes, the pCR was 34% and pDS occurred in 42% of patients.

The majority of EV-related adverse events were grade 2 or lower. 57% of patients had skin reactions, with 1 patient dying of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. A third of patients had peripheral neuropathy. There were no delays to surgery secondary to EV-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse surgery-related adverse events were anemia, ileus, and urinary tract infection.

Dr. Sridhar concluded as follows:

• Enfortumab Vedotin continues to show promising antitumor activity in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer

• The results are consistent with EV-103 Cohort H

• The safety profile of Enfortumab Vedotin was similar to previously reported data from Enfortumab Vedotin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma

• No new safety signals; but close monitoring for toxicities remains important

• No surgeries were delayed due to Enfortumab Vedotin-related treatment-emergent adverse events

• This first data disclosure from EV-103 Cohort L supports the ongoing phase 3 programs evaluating Enfortumab Vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab in MIBC (KN-905, KN-B15)

• Additional follow-up will allow characterization of event-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival data from Cohort L

Presented by: Srikala Sridhar, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Professor, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON

Written by: Rashid K. Sayyid, MD, MSc – Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Clinical Fellow at The University of Toronto, @rksayyid on Twitter during the 2023 European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Congress held in Madrid, Spain between October 20th and 24th, 2023

• Petrylak D, Flaig TW, Mar N, et al. Study EV-103 Cohort H: Antitumor activity of neoadjuvant treatment with enfortumab vedotin monotherapy in patients (pts) with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are cisplatin-ineligible. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:Supplement 6.

Read at original source